brief refresher: in 2006 he started on a pilot basis on 5 x 1000, ie the possibility for taxpayers to allocate a quota of 5 per thousand income tax of individuals not to institutions profit. It 's a voluntary contribution with which the taxpayer, without additional charge, inform the tax authorities who devote part of their taxes. It was hailed as a great step for research and charity. A step that was more along the leg. Our politicians (perfect in the pigeon on the panel on the right) because they expected a minimal popular participation, perhaps counting on that gene to a cunning Whether idiot that keeps the average Italian from any choice that does not give an immediate advantage. Italians however have responded to the huge, donating in 2006, by 5 per thousand, more than 400 million euro. Well beyond the expectations of this law was passed. What to do? Saw it. We see a checkmate in six moves to make pale Kasparov: 1) Not advertised in the media, we need to in paragraph 1 of Article 1237 of the financial news on a 5 per thousand. A bad news. The article included a ceiling on expenditure, by reducing it to € 250 million, well below the 400 million donated in 2006. When you need to make money, why not save on research and Charity? The sum exceeds 250 million euro will remain in the portfolio of the State;
2) Due to a elephantine bureaucracy, to date no one knows how much is the share of 5 per thousand for associations in 2006. This means, for example, if an institution is involved in research can not plan a budget, or making plans for new research;
3) The shares of 5 per thousand in 2006 will be awarded with three years of delay. In practice, an institution that relied on those funds to complete a research project should freeze the experiments, to take it when it will be obsolete. An association of charities dealing with children or terminally ill children when the funds will not be and most such patients will be dead. It is said that there will be new players to be protected, and still talking about human lives can not be carried forward a principle of substitution;
4) In any case, the average life of small groups is less than 3 years. The State can not therefore settle the amount owed to institutions that no longer exist;
5) The registration lists that allow a candidate to receive 5 per thousand passes by a simple application form. The tax office is irrelevant control purposes and the boards of these institutions. The result is that among the organizations eligible candidates for funding include foundations of chartered accountants, federarchitetti the Milan soccer teams amateurish, a club Juventus in Bolzano, even a circle of witches in the Milanese followers of the Wicca religion. Only thing missing is a charity Ricucci-Coppola in the reconstruction of old towns, with the written constitution with whitebait on a brick;
6) The mechanism of income distribution is similar to the 8 per thousand. In the latter case, indeed, who expresses no preference sees its share allocated to the various entities in proportion to total preferences. The 5 per thousand works in reverse: those who do not indicate preferences will donate the entire amount to the state.
Yet another insult to the search. They used to say "the law passed, find the loophole." Now, to save time, the deception is located directly in Parliament.
2) Due to a elephantine bureaucracy, to date no one knows how much is the share of 5 per thousand for associations in 2006. This means, for example, if an institution is involved in research can not plan a budget, or making plans for new research;
3) The shares of 5 per thousand in 2006 will be awarded with three years of delay. In practice, an institution that relied on those funds to complete a research project should freeze the experiments, to take it when it will be obsolete. An association of charities dealing with children or terminally ill children when the funds will not be and most such patients will be dead. It is said that there will be new players to be protected, and still talking about human lives can not be carried forward a principle of substitution;
4) In any case, the average life of small groups is less than 3 years. The State can not therefore settle the amount owed to institutions that no longer exist;
5) The registration lists that allow a candidate to receive 5 per thousand passes by a simple application form. The tax office is irrelevant control purposes and the boards of these institutions. The result is that among the organizations eligible candidates for funding include foundations of chartered accountants, federarchitetti the Milan soccer teams amateurish, a club Juventus in Bolzano, even a circle of witches in the Milanese followers of the Wicca religion. Only thing missing is a charity Ricucci-Coppola in the reconstruction of old towns, with the written constitution with whitebait on a brick;
6) The mechanism of income distribution is similar to the 8 per thousand. In the latter case, indeed, who expresses no preference sees its share allocated to the various entities in proportion to total preferences. The 5 per thousand works in reverse: those who do not indicate preferences will donate the entire amount to the state.
Yet another insult to the search. They used to say "the law passed, find the loophole." Now, to save time, the deception is located directly in Parliament.
clicking here you will find a full list of entities.
0 comments:
Post a Comment